Religious controversy of carbon dating bones
peer reviewed technical papers: We have submitted six abstracts of our C-14 data and all were reviewed and turned down until finally one was accepted for oral and poster presentations at the Asia Oceania Geophysics Society-American Geophysical Union Assembly [AOGS-AGU] of 2000 scientists in Singapore in August of 2012 for the Biogeoscience session.Regarding why there were no questions on the You Tube presentation – the hotel conference projectionist stopped taping without our knowledge.
Siena, nell’ottobre 2009 and in Germany in English by Brandenstein-Zeppelin and Stockhausen. Evolution and the Sciences: A Critical Examination. (English) Gerhard Hess Verlag, 88427 Bad Schussenried, Germany.
But going to the official conference site, the talk has clearly been removed.
(Go to Wednesday, room Leo 2, double-click on BGO2, which is the session that had the presentation.
How will we keep reaching them without your support? By rescinding the abstract, the AOGS has made the unscientific decision that C-14 cannot exist in dinosaur bones simply because of their presumed age, regardless of any evidence to the contrary.
Yet the widely documented evidence of preserved biomolecules in dinosaur bones and other presumably ancient fossils strongly suggests that C-14 should be present as well.
Search for religious controversy of carbon dating bones:
If scientists don’t like the conclusions of the presenters, they should make a case that the underlying data is faulty, instead of censoring it outright.